Second, since some people will sponsor more than the maximum number of distributors, the concept of spillover comes into play. In a 3 x 8 matrix, you can only have 3 distributors on your frontline. The fourth distributor that you sponsor will spill over into the matrix, and be placed under one of your frontline distributors. Spillover is important in narrow width plans, such as a 3 x 8 matrix, but much less important in a wide width plan, such as a 5 x 5 matrix.
With Bitcoin Auto Matrix the first thing you should look at before signing up is the cost. Sure, 0.005 doesn't seem like a lot of money. When it boils down to it, you are only looking at spending $11.74. But since the site isn't clear where that money goes exactly you should think twice before handing it over. You see, Bitcoin Auto Matrix doesn't provide any information on who owns the site. For all, you know that $11.74 is going straight to the admin's bank account.
Forced matrix compensation plans are typically described by two numbers: the width times the depth. This means a 3 x 8 matrix allows you to sponsor 3 frontline distributors and pays 8 levels deep. Any distributors that you sponsor beyond your first 3 must be placed underneath others in the matrix. A 5 x 7 matrix is 5 wide (front line) and 7 levels deep. On paper, a forced matrix comp plan looks like a “perfect” example of a unilevel compensation plan. Here is what a completely full 3 x 5 matrix looks like:
In case members can only register on your site via ePin, set the Sole Payment Option to Yes. This would make the ePin field mandatory on the user registration form and a visitor would need a valid unused ePin to complete his registration. If this value is set to No, a visitor will be able to register on the site even without specifying a valid ePin. In this case you would need to manually mark the member as Paid / Unpaid under Users -> All Users or assign a valid ePin to the user on that page. Alternately, the user can also input a valid ePin and upgrade his account to a paid account from his Member’s Area.
Bitcoin has fallen sharply through the December 2019 lows in a trend sequence (wave C) that should be proportional to the first leg down (wave A). This gives an equality target of 3064 which is just below the major low of 2018. We can see the wave C is already mature and should have one last leg down. However, any new low would invalidate our view of a trend higher from the 2018 low and while we could see a large bounce from 3064 it will not go to new highs and will have longer term implications. We will deal w8th these if and when a new low is made.